Definition: And the sons of Micah [were], Pithon, and Melech, and Tahrea, [and Ahaz].

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Chronicles 9:41. It’s a bit complex at first, but we can understand it as a story about the lineage of a powerful family in ancient Israel. Here's what it means, explained simply: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a group of prominent rulers and people who lived in a specific area – likely near Jerusalem – during a time of great importance in Israel’s history. They were known as the “sons of Micah,” “Pithon,” and “Melech.” Let's unpack it into parts: “The sons of Micah…” : This refers to a specific line of rulers who held significant power and influence. "Micah" was a name associated with leadership and prosperity in the Old Testament. “…Pithon…” : This means “the wealthy” or “the prosperous.” It suggests they were successful merchants, landowners, or individuals who amassed wealth. “…and Melech…” : This refers to a ruler named Melech, likely the king of that area. “…and Tahrea…” : “Tahrea” means "the finest" or "the best." It indicates they were known for their quality and excellence. “…and Ahaz.” : This is the final name – “Ahaz.” This suggests a connection to a lineage that had been established over many generations, perhaps as an important part of a royal family. Putting it all together - A Story of Prosperity: The verse tells us about a group of rulers who were exceptionally wealthy and powerful. They were known for their good fortune, their leadership, and the quality of their people. It’s like a historical record of a thriving dynasty. Important Note: The Bible doesn't explicitly state why these rulers were so important or what their role was in Israel's history. However, this verse gives us a glimpse into a time when this family held significant influence and contributed to the prosperity of the land. --- In short, this verse describes a powerful and wealthy family that played a key role in the history of Israel. Do you want me to: Explain another part of 1 Chronicles? Discuss the significance of this verse within a larger context of biblical history?